<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Positively Negative</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.joyfulcynicblog.com/index.php/2008/05/19/positively-negative/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.joyfulcynicblog.com/index.php/2008/05/19/positively-negative/</link>
	<description>Laughter and Libertarianism from the Heartland</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Apr 2010 03:20:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sharon</title>
		<link>http://www.joyfulcynicblog.com/index.php/2008/05/19/positively-negative/comment-page-1/#comment-90</link>
		<dc:creator>Sharon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2008 18:45:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.joyfulcynicblog.com/?p=38#comment-90</guid>
		<description>Of course.  I suspect that there are really no negative words without corresponding positives.

In some cases, the positive just isn&#039;t readily apparent.  As a friend of my older son&#039;s pointed out, the opposite of &lt;em&gt;inept&lt;/em&gt; is &lt;em&gt;adept&lt;/em&gt;.

In other cases, the positive has been lost, or is used more rarely than the negative.  &lt;em&gt;Canny&lt;/em&gt;, for instance, is heard less often that &lt;em&gt;uncanny&lt;/em&gt;.  (&lt;em&gt;Canny&lt;/em&gt; and &lt;em&gt;couth&lt;/em&gt; are both related to &lt;em&gt;ken&lt;/em&gt;, knowledge.)

In still other cases, what appears to be a negative word really isn&#039;t.  &lt;em&gt;Distraught&lt;/em&gt; is a variation of &lt;em&gt;distract&lt;/em&gt;, which just means to pull apart.

But still, it&#039;s great fun to play with....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Of course.  I suspect that there are really no negative words without corresponding positives.</p>
<p>In some cases, the positive just isn&#8217;t readily apparent.  As a friend of my older son&#8217;s pointed out, the opposite of <em>inept</em> is <em>adept</em>.</p>
<p>In other cases, the positive has been lost, or is used more rarely than the negative.  <em>Canny</em>, for instance, is heard less often that <em>uncanny</em>.  (<em>Canny</em> and <em>couth</em> are both related to <em>ken</em>, knowledge.)</p>
<p>In still other cases, what appears to be a negative word really isn&#8217;t.  <em>Distraught</em> is a variation of <em>distract</em>, which just means to pull apart.</p>
<p>But still, it&#8217;s great fun to play with&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Crossed Pond</title>
		<link>http://www.joyfulcynicblog.com/index.php/2008/05/19/positively-negative/comment-page-1/#comment-84</link>
		<dc:creator>The Crossed Pond</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 May 2008 23:01:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.joyfulcynicblog.com/?p=38#comment-84</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Dear Joyful Cynic...&lt;/strong&gt;

Couth.
......</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Dear Joyful Cynic&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Couth.<br />
&#8230;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

